Harper’s utterance an attempt to classify

One of the most talked of points since last week’s leaders debate was the uttering of the phrase “old-stock Canadians” by Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

The Prime Minister used the term in connection with the topic of health care for refugees, stating, “We do not offer them a better healthcare plan than the ordinary Canadian can receive, and I think that’s something most new and existing and old stock Canadians agree with.”

Questions and accusations immediately flew around following the 56-year-old Prime Minister’s remark.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau, as reported by the National Post on Sept. 18, said the old-stock comment demonstrated Harper uses “the politics of division” and doesn’t believe that “a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian.”

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair returned with the point that he did not like to divide people into categories and that, as reported in The Star and other media outlets, adding “we’re all Canadians.”

It was a moment both party leaders used to seize on a well-worn accusation of the current administration, that it seeks to categorize and divide the national populace.

Harper did attempt an explanation the following day as reported by the CBC News on Sept. 18, that he was referring to “Canadians who have been the descendants of immigrants for one or more generations.”

Whether a loose definition of “old-stock” or not, the Prime Minister’s history and political entourage speak to another objective, that of separating and so appealing to The Conservative’s traditional base.

Harper retained the services of Lynton Crosby, an Australian political strategist critics claim to be a propagandist and practitioner of dog-whistle politics, which is the art of targeting messages to a specific segment of the voting public through coded or subtle language.

It would seem a strange coincidence then that the Prime Minister would decide to use such a term on a nationally televised debate without having previously, or in that moment, considered what the use of the phrase could drum up.

The subject of refugees, which the government has been battered on as of recent given the crises in Europe, is an area Harper would more likely than not have brushed up on, specifically for the debate.

There had to have been some forethought on the type of response to present in lieu of a question on refugees in Canada. It would be ill-prepared not to have.

Jennifer Ditchburn of the Canadian Press, wrote, “Crosby has also been linked to tactics that have rallied voters fearful of immigration and crime behind the campaigns he advises.”

It’s not out of the question Harper and his advisors calculated the likelihood of “new Canadians” finding fault with the term and saw the advantage of playing to their traditional base as outweighing any political fallout.

While 2011’s census data showed 20.6 per cent of the population of Canada was foreign-born, which is about 6.77 million citizens, who “new Canadians” will vote for, let alone how much of this base will even head to the polls Oct. 19, is difficult, if not impossible, to pinpoint — and political parties know this.

Harper’s reign over government communications has also been well documented, most notably in Lawrence’s Martin’s 2010 book Harperland: The Politics of Control.

And as reported by the CBC in June 2010, one former Harper-era Privy Council Official stated, “We discussed every single issue and micromanaged every news release — everything.”

That’s the method Harper used to secure his first majority in 2011, why, then, would the seasoned leader change the modus operandi that got his party 166 seats in the House? He, in all likelihood, wouldn’t.

Harper’s history of message control in concert with the hiring of Crosby thus makes it difficult to believe that the Prime Minister was speaking off-hand in last Thursday’s debate or that he miscommunicated the response he intended to give.

The use of the term “old-stock Canadians” presents itself as a dog-whistle to the Conservative’s traditional base, albeit via not so subtle execution.

If the intention is to be all-inclusive, it strikes as counter-intuitive to typify Canadians or place them into distinctive categories in a national debate.

Harper’s utterance felt like a delineation, and he actively, by way of his speech structure, placed Canadians into clear-cut groups.

Now whether that should matter is up to voters themselves to decide.

17 Responses to Harper’s utterance an attempt to classify

  1. Appreciate it for helping out, excellent info. “A man will fight harder for his interests than for his rights.” by Napoleon Bonaparte.

  2. velcro.co.uk says:

    Very interesting info !Perfect just what I was searching for! “The medium is the message.” by Marshall McLuhan.

  3. Yuki Prevo says:

    Utterly pent content material , thanks for entropy.

  4. Great write-up, I’m regular visitor of one’s website, maintain up the nice operate, and It’s going to be a regular visitor for a long time.

  5. You have remarked very interesting points ! ps decent internet site . “Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius.” by Conan Doyle.

  6. Because of this vaping CBD oil is taken into account healthier.

  7. This is really interesting, You’re an excessively skilled blogger.
    I have joined your rss feed and look ahead to in search of more of your great post.
    Also, I’ve shared your web site in my social networks! https://www.wholesalesiliconewristbands.com

  8. He was shot dead in March outside his clothing store.

  9. I used to be recommended this website by my cousin. I
    am no longer positive whether this put up is written by means of him as nobody else understand such designated about my trouble.
    You’re wonderful! Thanks!

  10. This article provides clear idea in favor of the new people of blogging, that truly how to do blogging and site-building.

  11. Good information. Lucky me I discovered your site by accident (stumbleupon).
    I have saved as a favorite for later!

  12. I have been exploring for a little bit for any high quality articles
    or blog posts on this kind of area . Exploring in Yahoo
    I finally stumbled upon this site. Reading this information So i’m
    happy to show that I’ve an incredibly just right uncanny feeling I came upon just what I needed.
    I such a lot unquestionably will make certain to don?t disregard this website and give it a
    look on a relentless basis.

  13. Veronique says:

    At this time it seems like Movable Type is the
    top blogging platform available right now. (from what I’ve
    read) Is that what you are using on your blog?

  14. my website says:

    Right here is the right web site for everyone who would
    like to understand this topic. You know a whole lot its almost tough to argue
    with you (not that I really will need to…HaHa). You definitely put a
    fresh spin on a topic which has been discussed for many years.
    Excellent stuff, just wonderful!

  15. WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching for
    betting exchange

  16. An outstanding share! I have just forwarded this onto a coworker who had been conducting a little homework on this.
    And he in fact ordered me dinner simply because I stumbled upon it for him…
    lol. So let me reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!!

    But yeah, thanks for spending time to discuss this topic here on your site.

  17. Brandon says:

    Thanks for another great post. The place else could anybody get that kind
    of info in such a perfect method of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I’m at the search for such info.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.